The single judge dismissed the writ petition challenging the refusal to appoint a receiver, granting the petitioner liberty to prefer an appeal under Order 41 Rule 3(5) CPC, considering pendency.
Writ petition dismissed with liberty to prefer an appeal under Order 41 Rule 3(5) CPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4626/2019
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tushar Saraswat on behalf of Dr. Mahesh Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. JP Goyal, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. Abhi Goyal, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Order
05/04/2019
(2 of 2)
[CW-4626/2019]
a Receiver against which an appeal lies under Order 41 Rule 3(S) CPC.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
N.Gandhi/79
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition can be dismissed with liberty to appeal under Order 41 Rule 3(5) CPC regarding refusal to appoint a receiver.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Raukmani Devi W/o Late Shri Radheyshyam Ji Goyal and Kusum Goyal W/o Shri Rajendra Kumar Goyal
Gajanand S/o Late Shri Rajdheshyam Goyal and Satish Chand S/o Late Shri Rajdheshyam Goyal and Ashok Kumar S/o Late Shri Rajdheshyam Goyal and Rajendra Kumar S/o
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
