This court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the petitioner deposited the settled amount with the respondent Bank, rendering the legal proceeding unnecessary. The stay petition was also dismissed.
Writ petition and Stay Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4520/2019
Kadri Chemicals, Pandlu Road, Borunda Tehsil Pipar City, District Jodhpur Through Its Proprietor Mr. Rashid Khan S/o Vashir Aged About 70 Years, R/o Merta City, Near Nagour Chowki, Merta City, Nagour (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sajjan Singh Rajpurohit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Kanhaiyalal Khatri
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
24/07/2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in terms of the settlement entered into between petitioner and respondent Bank, the entire amount as settled, has been deposited by the petitioner with the respondent Bank and, as such, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
(2 of 2) [CW-4520/2019]
Mr. Kanhaiyalal Khatri, learned counsel for the respondent
No.4- The Central Bank Of India, does not dispute this factual position.
The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as having become infructuous.
The Stay Petition No.4400/2019 also stands dismissed.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
5-Ramesh/-
Kadri Chemicals
Union Of India
Reserve Bank Of India
Central Bank Of India
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
