A Single Bench allowed the writ petition by relying on the previous judgment of Ravi Jajot, directing the respondents to decide pending factual and legal issues through a Redressal Committee within thirty days.
Writ petition allowed in terms of Ravi Jajot judgment; respondents directed to decide pending issues via Redressal Committee within 30 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ No. 417/2019
Beena W/o Sh. Girdhari Lal, Aged About 43 Years, By Caste Harijan, R/o Harijan Basti, Ratanada, Jodhpur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. N.S. Rathore For Respondent(s) : Ms. Rekha Borana, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI
Order
11/01/2019
Learned counsel for the parties submit that the issues raised in the present writ petition are squarely covered by judgment of this Court in Ravi Jajot v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10496/2018 , decided on 30.8.2018 and, therefore, the present writ petition may also be decided in terms of the said judgment.
In the case of Ravi Jajot (supra), a Coordinate Bench of this Court after dealing with the issues, raised therein, inter alia, directed as under:-
“92. Before parting with this judgment, this Court makes it clear that any issue other than the issues dealt with by this Court in this judgment, which remains open, shall be represented by the petitioners to the respondents, and the respondents shall decide all those factual and legal
(2 of 2)
[CW-417/2019]
issues by passing a respective speaking order in the cases of the petitioners, after giving them proper opportunity of hearing, strictly in accordance with law, as it is not possible for this Court to go into individual facts of individual petitioner in such exercise, and therefore, this Court directs the respondents to pass lawful and speaking orders in all those matters.
In view of the submissions made, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is allowed in terms of judgment in the case of Ravi Jajot (supra) with similar directions as noticed hereinbefore.
(ARUN BHANSALI),J
199-AK Chouhan/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition regarding recruitment issues of Safai Karamchari may be disposed of in terms of the judgment in Ravi Jajot v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Whether the petitioners can approach the Court again after the respondents decide their representations.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ravi Jajot v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.Followed¶14
Ravi Jajot v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10496/2018
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Beena W/o Sh. Girdhari Lal
State Of Rajasthan, Through The Director Cum Joint Secretary, Local Self Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan
Municipal Corporation, Jodhpur Through Its Commissioner
Arun Bhansali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Arun Bhansali
Parties & counsel
