Connected writ petitions were disposed of by relying on a prior bench judgment (Dhanraj Meena) regarding the interpretation of specific rules concerning pay fixation and relief for government employees.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2545/2019
Subhash Meghwal S/o Shri Sugana Ram Meghwal, aged about 26 years, R/o Kayamkhani Colony, Sehla, District Churu (Raj.).
----Petitioner
Versus
Connected with
S. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2748/2019
Jetha Ram S/o Shri Kriparam, aged about 26 years, R/o Ward No. 05, Jhabra, District Jaisalmer (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
(2 of 3)
[CW-2545/2019]
Senior Secondary School, Lakha, Panchayat Samiti Sam, District Jaisalmer.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. J.S. Bhaleria For Respondent(s) : Mr. H.G. Chanda for Mr. K.K. Bissa
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
14/10/2019
Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in the present writ petitions is squarely covered by the judgment passed by this Court in batch of writ petitions led by S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12846/2017 (Dhanraj Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan & ors.) decided on 15.01.2018 .
In the case of Dhanraj Meena (supra), the following order was passed :-
“In view of the specific provision i.e. second proviso to Rule 24 of RSR as well as the judgment of this Court in the case of Praveen Kumar Yadav (supra) and Chandra Kala Saini (supra), the stand taken by the respondents in orders dated 2.9.2015 (Annex.R/1) and 4.12.2017 (Annex.R/2), is without any basis.
In view thereof, the writ petitions filed by the petitioners are allowed, as the petitioners have already been relieved pursuant to the interim orders passed by this Court, the said interim orders passed by this Court directing to relieve the petitioners are made absolute.
(3 of 3)
[CW-2545/2019]
It is further directed that the respondents while dealing with the cases of the petitioners pertaining to their pay fixation etc. would follow the provisions of Rules 24 and 26 of the RSR as per law.
In cases where the petitioners have been relieved provisionally under the directions of this Court, the Authorities would pass appropriate orders pertaining to relieving of the petitioners alongwith their last pay certificate (L.P.C.), where they were serving earlier.”
In view of the above position, the present writ petitions are also disposed of in terms of judgment passed in the case of
Dhanraj Meena (supra).
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
183 & 184-Inder/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petitions stand disposed of following the judgment in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12846/2017.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Dhanraj Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan & ors.Followed¶32
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12846/2017 (Dhanraj Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan & ors.) decided on 15.01.2018
Praveen Kumar YadavFollowed¶34
Chandra Kala SainiFollowed¶34
Subhash Meghwal
Jetha Ram
State of Rajasthan
Vinit Kumar Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
