High Court closed the writ proceedings as the petitioner did not press the application during arguments.
Writ proceedings stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writs No. 2371/2019
Sunil Kumar Khandelwal Son Of Shri Shiv Charan Khandelwal, Aged About 36 Years, By Caste Khandelwal, Resident Of 43/51/1, Varun Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. A. Verma For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Order
04/02/2019
(2 of 2)
[CW-2371/2019]
After arguing the matter for some length, learned counsel for the petitioner did not press the writ application.
Accordingly, writ proceedings stand closed.
(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA),J
Pooja/190
Sunil Kumar Khandelwal
Chairman, Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited
Executive Engineer (Vigilance), Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited
Junior Engineer (Vigilance), Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited
Vinod Kumar Govil
Smt. Sushila Govil
Veerendra Singh Siradhana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
