Badri Narayan Yadav S/O Late Shri Harinarayan Yadav v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director

Rajasthan HC25 Mar 2019CW/20712/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court addressed whether a fresh order was needed for payment of retiral benefits previously adjudged in pending petitions. It directed the Corporation to pay dues earlier ordered with interest.

What did the court decide?

Petition referred to the court of Single Judge which had previously directed payment within six months with 6% interest.

Badri Narayan Yadav S/O Late Shri… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

-1-

¶2

jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; t;iqj ihB] t;iqj

¶3

vkn'ks

¶4

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20712/2018

¶5

Badri Narayan Yadav S/o Late Shri Harinarayan Yadav, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Vpo Raithal, Via Kaladera, District Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶6

---Petitoner

¶7

Versus

¶8

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director, Head Office, Parivahan Marg, Chomu House, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶9

General Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Tire Plant, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

---Respondents

vkns'k fnukad %

25-03-2019

ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh cuokjhyky 'kekZ

¶14

Jh jkgqy ?kh;k] vf/koDrk&;kph dh vksj lsA Jh jkgqy yks<k] vf/koDRkk&izR;FkhZx.k dh vksj lsA

¶15

vf/koDrk ;kph us fuosnu fd;k gS fd leku ifjfLFkfr;ksa ,oa leku fookfnr fcUnq ls lacaf/kr izdj.k ,dyihB nhokuh fjV ;kfpdk la[;k 14748@2014 ¼izgykn flag cuke eSusftax Mk;jsDVj] vkj-,l-vkj-Vh-lh- o vU;½ tks fd fnukad 28-09-2015 dks fu.khZr fd;k x;k gS vkSj mlds ckn ,dyihB nhokuh voekuuk ;kfpdk la[;k 1500@2016 ¼’kadjyky pkS/kjh cuke Jh jkts’k ;kno o vU;½ tks fd fnukad 06tqykbZ] 2018 dks fu.khZr dh tk pqdh gSA vr% orZeku ;kfpdk dks Hkh mlh vuq:i fu.khZr dj fn;k tkosA

¶16

vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ us Hkh vf/koDrk ;kph ds rdksaZ dk leFkZu djrs gq, fuosnu fd;k gS fd izgykn flag cuke eSusftax Mk;jsDVj] vkj-,l-vkj-Vhlh- o vU; ¼mijksDr½ ds izdj.k esa N% ekg esa Hkqxrku djus dk vkns’k fn;k x;k Fkk] fdUrq mlds ckn ’kadjyky pkS/kjh cuke Jh jkts’k ;kno o vU; ¼mijksDr voekuuk ;kfpdk½ ds izdj.k esa iwoZ esa lsokfuo`Rr gq,

¶17

-2-

¶18

deZpkfj;ksa@vf/kdkfj;ksa dks igys rFkk ckn esa lsokfuo`Rr deZpkfj;ksa@vf/kdkfj;ksa dks mlds ckn Hkqxrku djus gsrq vkns’k fn;k x;k gSA rnuqlkj gh bl ;kfpdk dk fuLrkj.k dj fn;k tkosA

¶19

lquk x;k] izLrqr rdksaZ ij fopkj fd;k x;kA

¶20

bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB us izgykn flag cuke eSusftax Mk;jsDVj] vkj-,l-vkj-Vh-lh- o vU; ¼mijksDr½ ds izdj.k esa fnukad 28-09-2015 dks fuEu vkns’k ikfjr fd;k gS&

¶21

“ The petitiones are those who retired from services of the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation (in short “the Corporation”) but have not been extended retiral and other benefits, which include overtime, night allowance, earned leave, etc. It is due to financial crisis in the Corporation. It is stated by the counsel appearing for the Corporation that despite making efforts by the Corporation, they could not get the fund so as to make due payments to the petitioners and others who are entitled for it. The corporation has given cognizance to the problem and in that course, could find out as to how much amount is payable against different source, which include overtime arreas, pay fixation and other related sources. A copy of the letter dated 16th January, 2015 was also referred to show that efforts have been made by the Corporation even to seek permission to sale a chunk of land to secure amount for its onward payments to the petitioners. In view of above, the Corporation is alive of the situation and their obligation for the payment, but they were unable to pay entire due amount.

¶22

It is true that petitioners are entitled to the due benefit of pension and gratuity apart from all the benefits and for the delayed payment even reasonable interest. The prayer made by the petitioners has not been opposed by the Corporation as such, rather Shri R.N. Mathur, Senior Advocate sought time on the last date to seek instruction and after pursuing the corporation, it is given out that within a period of six months, the due amount would be paid to the petitioners with interest.

¶23

Looking to the facts aforesaid, all these writ petitions are disposed of with the direction to the Corporation to make payment of due amount to the petitioners within a period of six months from today. It would be along with interest @6% p.a.”

¶24

mlds ckn ’kadjyky pkS/kjh cuke Jh jkts’k ;kno o vU; ¼mijksDr voekuuk ;kfpdk½ ds izdj.k esa bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB us ;g vkns’k ikfjr fd;k gS fd&

¶25

“In the event the RSRTC were to breach the order

¶26

-3-

¶27

of priority determined by this court in payment of retiral benefits to superannuating employees of RSRTC to the petitioner's detriment, he would be free to move an application for recall of this order and to pursue the petition afresh.”

¶28

rnuqlkj izgykn flag cuke eSusftax Mk;jsDVj] vkj-,l-vkj-Vh-lho vU; ¼mijksDr½ izdj.k ds izdk’k esa bl ;kfpdk dk fuLrkj.k fd;k tkrk gS rFkk ’kadjyky pkS/kjh cuke Jh jkts’k ;kno o vU; ¼mijksDr voekuuk ;kfpdk½ esa ikfjr vkns’k ds vuqlj.k esa v;kphx.k dks funsZf’kr fd;k tkrk gS fd os ;kph ls iwoZ lsokfuoRr deZpkfj;ksa@vf/kdkfj;ksa dks lsokfuofRr ykHk dk Hkqxrku djus ds ckn ;kph dk uEcj tgka vkrk gS] mls Hkh lsokfuo`fRr dk ykHk e; C;kt ns fn;k tkosA

¶29

rnuqlkj bl fjV ;kfpdk dk fuLrkj.k fd;k tkrk gSA

¶30

¼cuokjh yky 'kekZ½ U;k;kf/kifr

¶31

feRry@205

Badri Narayan Yadav S/O Late Shri Harinarayan Yadav v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Badri Narayan Yadav S/O Late Shri Harinarayan Yadav v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation through Its Chairman Cum Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Phool Singh S/O Rewadya B/C Bairwa Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Anil Kumar Sharma S/O Shri Gopi Lal B/C Brahmin Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Vishnu S/O Bhanwarlal B/C Nayak Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Smt. Bhawana Sharma D/O Shri Satyavart Benjawal W/O Shri Shakti Bhushan Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Arvind Kumar Saini S/O Rameshwar Saini Vs State of Rajasthan through Principle Secretary

Ramavatar Sharma S/O Shri Satyanarayan Vs Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation