Disposes identical writ petitions following a prior order, directing claimants to avail themselves of the previous judgment's directions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ No. 10683/2017
United Spirits Limited
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan & Ors.
----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ No. 5531/2016 S.B. Civil Writ No.6670/2016 S.B. Civil Writ No.7609/2017 S.B. Civil Writ No.7838/2017 S.B. Civil Writ No.12621/2017 S.B. Civil Writ No.1629/2018 S.B. Civil Writ No.2311/2018 S.B. Civil Writ No.1636/2016 S.B. Civil Writ No.12798/2017 S.B. Civil Writ No.6742/2017 S.B. Civil Writ No.3705/2017
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dinesh Pal Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra on behalf of Dr. Sachin Acharya
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA Order
12/03/2019
Counsel for the petitioners states that this Court has already passed order in identical cases on 11.03.2019. The issue involved in the present cases is being same, the order passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 369/2016 and other connected matters be also passed in the present cases.
Counsel appearing for the respondents does not object.
It would be appropriate to quote the relevant paragarphs of the order passed by this Court yesterday i.e. on 11.03.2019 in the bunch of cases, lead case being S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.369/2016 (Union Spirits Limited Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) , which read as under:-
[CW-10683/2017]
(2 of 2)
“12. Accordingly, let the exercise be done for fixing the amount of compounding fees as well as the amount for the revenue loss caused and the Excise Commissioner would be free to reach to a particular conclusion. The amount so calculated would be strictly in terms of provisions of Section 70 of the Act of 1950 (quoted hereinabove). However, the Excise Commissioner would also taken into consideration the law as laid down by the Apex Court, various High Courts and other provisions relating assessment of fees for compounding and the value to be arrived at.
Accordingly, the present writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the order as passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.369/2016, quoted above.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
114-Arvind/-
United Spirits Limited
State Of Rajasthan
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
