Multiple writ petitions filed by various petitioners against the State of Rajasthan were dismissed as infructuous because representations filed by the petitioners were accepted, rendering the writs unnecessary.
Writ petitions dismissed as infructuous due to acceptance of representations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ No. 14580/2018
Satya Prasan Singh ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Civil Writ No. 14622/2018 Yashpal Singh ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ No. 14629/2018 Mansingh ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ No. 14631/2018 Rajendra Singh Rathore ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ No. 14669/2018 Umaid Kumar Nai ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ No. 14685/2018 Mula Ram ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ No. 14703/2018 Vikash Kumar Pooniya ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ No. 14706/2018 Chena Ram Choudhary ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent
(2 of 4)
S.B. Civil Writ No. 14717/2018
Gopal Chand
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ No. 14739/2018 Vijay Saini ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ No. 14831/2018 Ritu Swami ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ No. 14867/2018 Babulal ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ No. 14898/2018 Ram Singh Rathore ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ No. 15013/2018 Indraj Soni ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ No. 15047/2018 Tara Chand Acharya ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ No. 15051/2018 Uttam Singh Chouhan ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ No. 15055/2018 Chhinder Pal ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent
(3 of 4)
S.B. Civil Writ No. 15186/2018
Kailash Nagrachi
----Petitioner
Versus State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ No. 15278/2018 Raj Kumar Jangir ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ No. 15282/2018 Narendra Singh ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ No. 15371/2018 Kaptan Meena ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ No. 15429/2018 Hargovind Singh ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ No. 15477/2018 Kailash Gurjar ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ No. 15595/2018 Kamleshwar Gandhrav ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ No. 15727/2018 Tulsaram Parihar ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahaveer Singh, Mr. Surendra Bagmalani,
(4 of 4)
For Respondent(s) : Mr. B.L. Bhati, G.C.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI
Order
09/01/2019
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the representations filed by the petitioners have been accepted and, therefore, the writ petitions filed by the petitioners have been rendered infructuous. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the respondents, the writ petitions filed by the petitioners are dismissed as having become infructuous.
(ARUN BHANSALI),J
PKS/135,144,145,146,154,159,165,166 169,174,193,204,219,246,265,269,270, 287,309,310,321,328,334,353,367,
Satya Prasan Singh
State Of Rajasthan
Arun Bhansali
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
