The High Court allowed the writ petition and quashed the Trial Court's order rejecting a request to implead a subsequent purchaser under Civil Procedure Code. The Court directed the Trial Court to implead the purchaser in the partition suit.
Set aside the order dated 24.09.2016; allowed the application to implead Rahul Jain as respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ No. 12702/2016
Poona Ram S/o Shri Uda Ram, Near Railway Station, Khara, Tehsil-Phalodi, District-Jodhpur
----Petitioner
Versus
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Bhandari.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Order
21/02/2019
(2 of 3)
[CW-12702/2016]
(3 of 3)
[CW-12702/2016]
is directed to be impleaded as respondent in the proceedings. Notices be issued to him. The Trial Court to proceed thereafter.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
200-Ashutosh/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition should be allowed to set aside the Trial Court's order rejecting an application for impleading a subsequent purchaser of partitioned property.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Poona Ram S/o Shri Uda Ram
Mohan Ram S/o Shri Uda Ram
Rahul Jain S/o Shri Shikhar Chand Jain
Rama Kishan S/o Shri Uda Ram
Uda Ram S/o Shri Lakha Ram
Smt. Kaushalya S/o Brajmohan
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
