Disposed

Mohana Ram v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Rajasthan HC11 Nov 2019CW/11360/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a brief order, the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur disposed of a petition filed by an employee seeking service benefits. The court directed respondents to consider and decide the petitioner's representation within four weeks after it was moved, conditional upon the petitioner submitting the representation within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider and decide the petitioner's representation within four weeks if filed within two weeks.

Mohana Ram Vs State of Rajasthan and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11360/2017

¶3

Mohana Ram S/o Shri Ugama Ram, R/o Thorio Ki Dhani, Post Mnana, Tehsil Makrana, District Nagaur, Rajasthan.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan Through The Secretary, Department Of Rural And Panchayati Raj, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶7

Secretary, Department Of Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶8

Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner, District Bikaner, Rajasthan.

¶9

Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Jaisalmer, Rajasthan. 5. District Establishment Committee Through Its Chairman, Zila Parishad Jaisalmer, Rajasthan.

¶10

Mahipal Singh S/o Umaid Singh, C/o Block Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti, Sankhra, Zila Parishad Jaisalmer Rajasthan.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s)	: Dr. Nupur Bhati, Advocate
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Mahesh Joshi, Advocate,
	Mr. Piyush Bhandari, Advocate

¶13

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA

¶14

Order

¶15

11/11/2019

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in the present case has been settled by this Court in case titled Mukesh Kumar Tailor Vs. State of

¶17

Rajasthan & Anr., S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.750/2017, decided on 09.02.2017. At this stage, petitioner would be satisfied in case the respondents are directed to consider and decide the

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CW-11360/2017]

¶20

representation of the petitioner within a specific time frame after the petitioner moves a representation before the respondents.

¶21

In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of with a direction that in case petitioner moves representation before the respondents within two weeks from today, then the respondents shall dispose of the same expeditiously in accordance with law preferably within four weeks from the receipt of the representation along with certified copy of

¶22

this order.

¶23

(SABINA),J

¶24

89-Arvind/-

Mohana Ram v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohana Ram v. State of Rajasthan and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Chand Saini Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhadar @ Bahadur S/O Vilas Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramniwas S/O Mohanlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhupendra Singh Sodha Vs State of Rajasthan

Sunil Katara Vs State of Rajasthan

Wasim Hussain Gauri Vs State of Rajasthan