Nagar Palika Mandal and Anr. v. President Asangathith Majdoor Santh Andanr
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR…
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writs No. 11206/2018
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.F.Baig For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA Judgment / Order
09/01/2019
Counsel for the petitioner submits that correct facts could not be brought to the concerned Labour Court as ex-parte proceedings were undertaken against them. The exparte proceedings were undertaken on record on account of afflux of time and on account of not having any information about the concerned dates.
I have examined the award and finds that the Officer-incharge who was appointed to contest on behalf of the petitioner shows his complete afflux and appears to by default support the case of the respondents while granting liberty to the petitioner to move appropriate application for setting aside the exparte award. It is also directed that appropriate action be taken against the concerned officer-in-charge and the same should be reported to
(2 of 2)
[CW-11206/2018]
the concerned labour court who will look into for deciding the said
application.
With aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
Anu/34
Nagar Palika Mandal, Fatehpur Through Executive Officer, Nagar Palika, Fatehpur District Sikar
Director, Director Local Bodies, Rajasthan, Jaipur
President, Asangathith Majdoor Sangh, Rajasthan, Churu
Chand Prakash S/o Shri Atmaram Sharma, Resident Of Ward No. 20, Fatehpur District Sikar
Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court