Writ petitions filed by Bheru Nath Ji Mandir against Jyotiprakash and others were dismissed as infructuous following the disposal of the underlying suit. Stay applications were also dismissed.
Writ petitions dismissed as infructuous; stay applications dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10624/2012
Bheru Nath Ji Mandir through their caretaker :
All R/o Village Kuchera, Tehsil & District Nagour.
----Petitioners
Versus
All R/o Village Kuchera Tehsil & District Nagour.
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10684/2013
Jyotiprakash adopted S/o Shri Shivdevram Mirda, aged 36 years, B/c Mirdham, R/o Village Kuchera Tehsil & District Nagour.
----Petitioner
Versus
Bheru Nath Ji Mandir through :
(2 of 2)
[CW-10624/2012]
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. C. P. Soni, for petitionerrespondent-Jyoti Prakash. For Respondent(s) : Mr. D. D. Chitlangi, for respondentpetitioner-Bheru Nath Ji Mandir
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA
Order
22/07/2019
Mr. C. P. Soni, learned counsel appearing for the petitionerrespondent-Jyoti Prakash informing that the suit itself from which the impugned order emanates, has been decided and, therefore, the writ petitions have been rendered infructuous.
The writ petitions are dismissed accordingly.
The stay applications are also dismissed.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
134&135-A.Arora/-
Bheru Nath Ji Mandir through their caretaker
Jyotiprakash
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
