This criminal revision petition before the Rajashtan High Court from Jaipur Bench was admitted for the issuance of anticipatory bail to the accused-petitioner. The court set aside a previous order rejecting the bail application, noting the lack of reasoning and recent events.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 755/2019 Ajeet Singh Vs. State of Raj.
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqjA
%% vkns'k %%
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 755/2019
Ajeet Singh S/o Shri Bheevaram Meena B/c Meena, R/o Dhani Bodli Tan Dadiyarampura Ringus Dist. Sikar Raj.
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan Through P.p., Jaipur
----Respondent
%% mifLFkr %%
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh
;kph ds vf/koDrk Jh vfuy mieu dh vksj ls vf/koDrk vfuek tSuA yksd vfHk;kstd Jh vrqy 'kekZA
vkns'k fnukad 14-08-2019
U;k;ky; }kjk %&
v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky;] vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] Jhek/kksiqj ftyk lhdj }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k &21@2014 esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 02-03-2019] ftlds rgr ;kph&vfHk;qDr ds fo:) /kkjk 498, o 304ch Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dk vkjksi izFke`n"V;k cuuk ik;s tkus dk vkns'k fn;k x;k gS] ls O;fFkr
2
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 755/2019 Ajeet Singh Vs. State of Raj.
gksdj ;kph&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g QkStnkjh iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
cgl lquh xbZA ;ksX; vf/koDrk ;kph dk dFku jgk fd vk{ksfir vkns'k Li"V ugha gSA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us vkjksfir vijk/k ds dze esa fdl ekSf[kd o nLrkosth lk{; ij fopkj dj vkns'k ikfjr fd;k] bl ckcr rfud ek= Hkh u rks dksbZ fo'ys"k.k fd;k x;k gS ,oa u gh dksbZ rF; n'kkZ;s x;s gSaA vr% vk{ksfir vkns'k vikLr fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA
;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us bu rdksZa dk fojks/k fd;kA
leLr rF;ksa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA tgkWa vk{ksfir vkns'k dk iz'u gS] gkykWafd mDr vkns'k vkjksi ds dze esa ikfjr fd;k x;k gS ,oa vkjksi ds izdze ij izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.k ij fVIi.kh dh vko';drk ugha gksrh gS] ysfdu fQj Hkh ljljh rkSj ij i=koyh ij miyC/k fdl nLrkost o ekSf[kd lk{; ij fopkj djus ds i'pkr izFken`"V;k vkjksi cuuk ekuk x;k gS] bl ckcr laf{kIr mYys[k fd;k tkuk mfpr gSA bu rF;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, vkjksi ds dze esa iqu% lquokbZ gsrq izdj.k v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dks izfrizsf"kr fd;k tkuk mfpr gSA
ifj.kker% ;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk vkaf'kd :i ls Lohdkj dh tkrh gS ,oa v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dk vkns'k ek= iqu% lquokbZ fd;s tkus ds mn~ns'; ls vikLr fd;k tkdj v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dks funsZf'kr fd;k tkrk gS fd vkjksi ds dze esa nksuksa i{kks a dks iqu% lqudj] i=koyh ij miyC/k ekSf[kd o
3
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 755/2019 Ajeet Singh Vs. State of Raj.
nLrkosth lk{; dk laf{kIr rkSj ij mYys[k djrs gq,] vius iwoZ vkns'k ,oa bl vkns'k ls izHkkfor gq, fcuk fof/klEer vkns'k ikfjr djsA
;g vkns'k vkt fnukad 14-08-2019 dks Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 348 (i) ds rgr Hkkjr ljdkj dh vf/klwpuk jkti= la[;k &1] fnukad 02 tuojh] 1999 ,oa jktLFkku jkti= fnukafdr 10-03-1971 ds rgr fgUnh Hkk"kk ds iz;ksx dks izkf/kd`r fd;s tkus ds ifj.kkeLo:i fgUnh Hkk"kk esa fy[kk;k x;kA
¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr
Fkkokuh@&
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petition should be admitted to quash the previous order rejecting anticipatory bail.
4 provisions across 4 enactments
Ajeet Singh
State of Raj.
Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
