Remanded

Babulal S/O Shri Nanagram @ Bhagirath B/C Meena v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajasthan HC9 May 2019CRLR/2055/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single judge criminal revision petition challenged a judgment and order of sentencing involving the accused. The prosecution argued for murder charges while the accused contended for culpable homicide. The court decided to modify the charge.

What did the court decide?

The High Court order framing the charge of murder under Section 302 IPC was quashed and the accused was directed to be examined to frame the charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder under S

Babulal S/O Shri Nanagram @ Bhagirath B/C Meena… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 2055/2018 Babulal & Ors. Vs. State of Raj.

¶3

jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqjA

¶4

%% vkns'k %%

¶5

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 2055/2018

¶6

Babulal S/o Shri Nanagram @ Bhagirath B/c Meena, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Vill. Chatarpur Ps Shivdaspura Jaipur Raj. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)

¶7

Rajulal S/o Shri Nangaram @ Bhagirath B/c Meena, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Vill. Chatarpur Ps Shivdaspura Jaipur Raj. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)

¶8

----Petitioners/Accused

¶9

Versus

¶10

State Of Rajasthan Through Pp, Raj.

¶11

----Respondent

¶12

%% mifLFkr %%

¶13

ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh

¶14

;kphx.k ds vf/koDrk Jh izoh.k cyonkA yksd vfHk;kstd Jh vrqy 'kekZA

¶15

vkns'k fnukad 09-05-2019

¶16

U;k;ky; }kjk %&

¶17

v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky;] vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] dze&19] t;iqj egkuxj }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k &29@2018 esa

¶18

¶19

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 2055/2018 Babulal & Ors. Vs. State of Raj.

¶20

ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 25-10-2018] ftlds rgr

¶21

;kphx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) /kkjk 302 lifBr /kkjk 34 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dk vkjksi izFke`n"V;k cuuk ik;s tkus dk vkns'k fn;k x;k gS] ls O;fFkr gksdj ;kphx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls ;g QkStnkjh iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

¶22

cgl lquh xbZA ;ksX; vf/koDrk ;kphx.k dk dFku jgk fd bl izdj.k esa iSjoh gsrq ;kphx.k ls funsZ'k izkIr gSa] vr% izLrqr eheks ds vk/kkj ij izdj.k esa cgl lquh tk,A

¶23

cgl ds nkSjku mudk dFku jgk fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{; ds foijhr tkdj /kkjk 302@34 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds rgr vkjksi fojfpr tkus dk vkns'k fn;k x;k gS] tcfd miyC/k rF;kRed fLFkfr ds vk/kkj ij tcfd vf/kd&ls&vf/kd /kkjk 304 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dk vkjksi cuuk ekuk tk ldrk gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku jgk fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds le{k u rks ekjihV dk vk'k; Li"V Fkk rFkk u pksVksa dh izdfr ls erd dh e`R;q gksus dh iw.kZ lEHkkouk FkhA mudk rdZ jgk fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ek= pksVksa dh la[;k dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, /kkjk 302 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk dk vkjksi fojfpr fd;k x;k gSA bu rdksZa ds vk/kkj ij v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dk vk{ksfir vkns'k vikLr dj] ;kphx.k dks /kkjk 302 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ls mUeksfpr djrs gq, /kkjk 304 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa vkjksi fojfpr fd;s tkus ckcr funsZf'kr fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA

¶24

;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us bu rdksZa dk fojks/k fd;kA

¶25

¶26

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 2055/2018 Babulal & Ors. Vs. State of Raj.

¶27

leLr rF;ksa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k ds voyksdu ls izdV gksrk gS fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us vius vkns'k esa ?kVuk fnukad 03-052018 dh jkf= dh gksuk crkdj] fnukad 04-05-2018 dks fjiksVZ ntZ djokbZ xbZ gS rFkk f'konkliqjk dh ihlhvkj ls Qksu ij izkIr lwpuk ds vk/kkj ij erd fodkl ds vLirky esa HkrhZ gksus dh tkudkjh ds vk/kkj ij ifjoknh ds vLirky esa tkus ij erd fodkl ds 'kjhj ij pksVksa ds fu'kku] 'kjhj ij txg&txg dkys /kCcs] vka[k ij pksV ds fu'kku gksus] rRi'pkr fodkl dh e`R;q gksuk izdV gqvk gSA

¶28

v/khuLFk U;k;ky; us vk{ksfir vkns'k esa vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh ds c;kuksa dk gokyk fn;k gS ,oa c;kuksa ds vuqlkj vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh dk jktw eh.kk ds edku ij igqapus ij jktw eh.kk o ckcw eh.kk dk feyuk ,oa ,d yM+ds ds iSj jLlh ls cka/kdj j[ks gksuk ,oa mlds 'kjhj ij dkQh pksVsa vkuk crk;k x;k gSA bl dze esa iksLVekVZe fjiksVZ fnuakfdr 05-05-2018 ds voyksdu ls izdV gksrk gS fd e`rd ds 'kjhj ij dqy 34 pksVsa gksuk crk;k x;k gS rFkk pksV la[;k&6 esa QzsDpj Hkh gksuk izdV gqvk gSA

¶29

v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk e`rd dks jLlh ls cka/kdj j[ks tkus] mlds 'kjhj ij 34 pksVsa dkfjr gksus ,oa i=koyh ij miyC/k vU; lk{; o ;kphx.k ds vk'k; dks en~nsutj j[krs gq, /kkjk 302@34 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk ds dze esa vkjksi fojfpr fd;s tkus ds vkns'k esa ,slh dksbZ =qfV ugha dh xbZ gS] ftlls mlesa gLr{ksi fd;k tk ldsA

¶30

¶31

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 2055/2018 Babulal & Ors. Vs. State of Raj.

¶32

ifj.kker% ;kphx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g QkStnkjh iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA

¶33

;g vkns'k vkt fnukad 09-05-2019 dks Hkkjrh; lafo/kku ds vuqPNsn 348 (i) ds rgr Hkkjr ljdkj dh vf/klwpuk jkti= la[;k &1] fnukad 02 tuojh] 1999 ,oa jktLFkku jkti= fnukafdr 10-03-1971 ds rgr fgUnh Hkk"kk ds iz;ksx dks izkf/kd`r fd;s tkus ds ifj.kkeLo:i ewy fu.kZ; fgUnh Hkk"kk esa fy[kk;k x;kA jk-m-U;k- tks/kiqj ds dk;kZy; vkns'k dzekad 397 fnukafdr 03-10-2018 ds rgr iznRr vuqoknd ls vaxzsth Hkk"kk esa vuqokn djokdj mldh izekf.kr izfr Hkh lacaf/kr i{kdkj dks tkjh dh tk,A

¶34

¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr

¶35

Fkkokuh@&

Babulal S/O Shri Nanagram @ Bhagirath B/C Meena v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Babulal S/O Shri Nanagram @ Bhagirath B/C Meena v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramswaroop S/O Shri Mulchand B/C Saini Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajendra Phulwari Son of Shri Pukhraj Ji Vs the State of Rajasthan

Buddhi Prakash S/O Shri Badri Lal B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Sada Kaur Wife of Shri Mansingh, Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt Bala Devi W/O Shri Mahendra Singh B/C Chamar Vs State of Rajasthan

Prem Singh @ Prem Chand @ Chhitar Mal S/O Shri Jagdish Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan