Partly allowed

Surendra Kumar Nayak S/O Babulal Nayak v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC17 Oct 2019CRLR/1550/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of a Criminal Revision Petition regarding a Section 138 NI Act case. The court allowed compounding of the offence and directed remand of the case to the Prosecution Magistrate for granting compound under Section 147 NI Act the applicant stated despite pending magisterial proceedings and strike off status. The benefit of compounding was granted to the petitioner

What did the court decide?

The proceedings in the Mahadant kindly be remanded for the further hearing of the Petitioner to be granted release on bail and a compound to be allowed in the case. The record of the case be sent back

Surendra Kumar Nayak S/O Babulal Nayak Vs State of… — Money Laundering | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1550/2019

¶3

jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB t;iqjA

¶4

%% fu.kZ; %%

¶5

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1550/2019

¶6

Surendra Kumar Nayak S/o Babulal Nayak, R/o Ramdev Gurjar Ki Dukan Pass Jawahar Ki Nadi Hmt Ke Piche Beawar Road Ajmer

¶7

----Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶10

Vijendra Srivastav S/o Gajendra Nath, R/o 551/31 Chand Bawadi Kesar Ganj Dist. Ajmer

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

%% mifLFkr %%

¶13

ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh

¶14

;kph ds vf/koDrk Jh jktsUnz flag raojA ifjoknh ds vf/koDrk Jh fgeka'kq 'kekZA yksd vfHk;sktd Jh vrqy 'kekZA

¶15

fu.kZ; fnukad %% 17-10-2019

¶16

U;k;ky; }kjk %

¶17

v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky;] fof'k"V U;kf;d eftLVªsV] ¼,uvkbZ ,DV izdj.k½ dze&02] vtesj }kjk izdj.k la[;k &390@2015 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukafdr 19-9-2015] ftlds rgr v;kph&ifjoknh dh vksj ls izLrqr ifjokn ij ;kph&vfHk;qDr dks /kkjk 138 ijdzkE; fy[kr vf/kfu;e esa nks"kh

¶18

¶19

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1550/2019

¶20

djkj nsrs gq, Ng ekg ds dkjkokl ,oa 2]40]000@& :i;s dk vFkZn.M vf/kjksfir dj nf.Mr fd;k x;k gS] ds fo:) izLrqr nkf.Md vihy la[;k &130@2018 v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky;] vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] ¼efgyk mRihMu izdj.k½ vtesj }kjk fu.kZ; fnukad 5-10-2018 ls [kkfjt dh xbZ] ls O;fFkr gksdj ;kph&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA

¶21

dk;kZy; }kjk fudkyh xbZ =qfV ds rgr jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; ds fu;e 311 ¼3½ ds vuqlkj izek.ki= izLrqr ugha gksuk vafdr fd;k x;k gSA bl dze esa pwafd i{kksa ds e/; jkthukek gks x;k gS ,oa nksuksa i{k vkt U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr g S aA vr% ;kph dks U;kf;d vfHkj{kk ls NwV iznku dh tkdj mDr =qfV dks Hkh utjvankt fd;k tkrk gSA

¶22

cgl lquh xbZA ;ksX; vf/koDrk ;kph dk dFku jgk fd i{kksa ds e/; jkthukek gks pqdk gS rFkk ifjoknh dks ;kph }kjk jkthukek vuqlkj jkf'k vnk dj nh xbZ gS ,oa bl dze esa fyf[kr esa jkthukek i=koyh ij izLrqr gSA mDr jkthukek fjdkMZ ij ysrs gq, jkthukek ds vk/kkj ij izdj.k dk fuLrkj.k fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA

¶23

;ksX; vf/koDrk v;kph@ifjoknh us U;k;ky; ds le{k ;kph ds lkFk jkthukek gksus ,oa jkf'k izkIr gks tkus ds rF; dks Lohdkj fd;k ,oa jkthukek ds vk/kkj ij izdj.k dks fuLrkfjr fd;s tkus esa dksbZ ,srjkt ugha gksuk Hkh izdV fd;k gSA

¶24

nkSjkus cgl ;ksX; vf/koDrk ;kph us U;k;ky; esa ,d fofo/k izkFkZuk i= izLrqr dj izdV fd;k fd ;kph dh vksj ls cM+h eqf'dy ls jkf'k ifjoknh dks vnk dj nh xbZ gSA ;kph dh vkfFkZd fLFkfr Bhd ugha gS rFkk vk; dk dksbZ lk/ku ugha gSA vr%

¶25

¶26

S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1550/2019

¶27

fo'ks"k ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, fof/kd lsok izkf/kdj.k esa tek djkbZ tkusokyh jkf'k ls NwV iznku fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA mDr izkFkZuk i= dks vfHkys[k ij fy;k tkrk gSA

¶28

fopkj fd;k x;kA nksuksa i{kksa ds e/; jkthukek gksus ds dze esa fyf[kr esa jkthukek izLrqr fd;k x;k gS ,oa ;ksX; vf/koDrk ifjoknh us Hkh jkthukek gksuk Lohdkj fd;k gSA bu rF;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, rFkk ;kph dh vkfFkZd fLFkfr detksj gksus ds dze esa izLrqr rF;ksa dh jks'kuh esa fof/kd lsok izkf/kdj.k esa tek djkbZ tkusokyh jkf'k ls NwV iznku dh tkdj /kkjk 147 ijdzkE; fy[kr vf/kfu;e ,oa /kkjk 320 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds izko/kkuksa ds rgr jkthukek ds vk/kkj ij izdj.k dk fuLrkj.k fd;k tkuk mfpr gSA

¶29

ifj.kker% ;kph dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk jkthukek ds vk/kkj ij Lohdkj dh tkrh gS ,oa v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky;] fof'k"V U;kf;d eftLVªsV] ¼,uvkbZ ,DV izdj.k½ dze&2] vtesj }kjk izdj.k la[;k &390@2015 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukafdr 19-9-2015 ,oa nkf.Md vihy la[;k &130@2018 esa v/khuLFk vihyh; U;k;ky;] vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] ¼efgyk mRihMu izdj.k½ vtesj }kjk ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 5-10-2018 vikLr fd;k tkrk gS rFkk ;kph&vfHk;qDr dks /kkjk 138 ijdzkE; fy[kr vf/kfu;e ds vkjksi ls c:, jkthukek nks"keqDr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶30

¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr

¶31

,e 'kekZ&37

Surendra Kumar Nayak S/O Babulal Nayak v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surendra Kumar Nayak S/O Babulal Nayak v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jaisingh S/O Shri Karan Singh B/C Rajput Vs State of Rajasthan

Ganpat S/O Shri Nandan B/C Kanjar Vs State of Rajasthan

Rekha Sharma W/O Shri Jagdish Sharma B/C Brahman Vs State of Rajasthan

Sheela Devi W/O Late Shri Jetha Nand B/C Sindhi Vs State of Rajasthan

Irsad Son of Mammal Vs State of Rajasthan

Vinod Nama S/O Ramesh Nama Vs State of Rajasthan