In CRL Revision No. 1146/2018, the High Court partly allowed the petition challenging conviction under the Arms Act. The Court reduced the sentence to the period already undergone while maintaining the fine requirement.
Sentence reduced to period already undergone; fine of Rs.1,000 imposed payable otherwise imprisonment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Revision No. 1146/2018
Pappu @ Basantilal S/o Kashiram, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Junakheda, Police Station Asnawar District Jhalawar (Raj.) (At Present Confined To District Jail, Jhalawar)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Jaipur
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal. For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.R. Singh Rathore, PP.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Order
03/01/2019
(2 of 2)
[CRLR-1146/2018]
The only prayer made before the Court is to reduce the sentence to the period already undergo by the petitioner.
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
Chandan/39
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the sentence should be reduced to the period already undergone by the petitioner without pressing the petition on merits.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pappu @ Basantilal
State Of Rajasthan
Pankaj Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
