Dismissed

Aajid Khan Son of Shri Ashu Khan, by Caste Meo v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC13 Sept 2019CRLMP/82/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan Bench at Jaipur dismissed a Criminal Miscellaneous Petition seeking quashing of an FIR. The court accepted the Public Prosecutor's report that no offence was made out, rendering the petition infructuous.

What did the court decide?

Disposal of the CRIMINAL MISC. Petition No. 82/2019 and the stay application as the petition has become infructuous.

Aajid Khan Son of Shri Ashu Khan, by… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 82/2019

¶3

Aajid Khan Son Of Shri Ashu Khan, By Caste Meo, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Mev Khera, P.s. Ramgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)

¶4

Ahamad Khan Son Of Shri Majeed Khan, By Caste Meo, R/o Village Alampur, P.s. Naugava, District Alwar (Raj.)

¶5

Pooja Choudhary @ Pooja Khan, D/o Shri Fateh Singh, Wife Of Shri Aajid Khan, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Janta Colony, Mungaska, P.s. Aravali Vihar, Alwar (Raj.) At Present R/o Village Mev Khera, P.s. Ramgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, through P.P.

¶9

Superintendent Of Police, Alwar, District Alwar (Raj.)

¶10

S.h.o. P.s. Ramgarh, District Alwar (Raj.)

¶11

Fateh Singh Son Of Shri Bihari Lal, By Caste Jat, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Mastabad, P.s. Ramgarh, District Alwar (Raj.) At Present R/o Jatna Colony, P.s. Aravali Vihar, Alwar (Raj.)

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s)	:	Ms. Mumtaz for Mr. Sakir Deen.
For Complainant(s)	:	Mr. Girish Khandelwal.
For State	:	Mr. Ganesh Saini, PP.

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

¶15

Order

¶16

13/09/2019

¶17

Accused/petitioners have preferred this Criminal Misc. Petition seeking quashing of FIR No.525/2018, registered at Police Station Aravali Vihar, Alwar, District Alwar.

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CRLMP-82/2019]

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the report which is taken on record. As per the report, Police has come to the conclusion that offence is not made out.

¶21

In view of the same, misc. petition seeking quashing of FIR has become infructous and the same is dismissed as having become infructous. Stay application stands disposed.

¶22

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

¶23

CHANDAN /53

Aajid Khan Son of Shri Ashu Khan, by Caste Meo v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aajid Khan Son of Shri Ashu Khan, by Caste Meo v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nirbhay Singh S/O Shri Mangilal B/C Ahir Vs State of Rajasthan

M/S Jetking Infotrain Ltd. Vs State of Rajasthan

Jagdish Singh S/O Harvansh Singh B/C Jat Vs State of Rajasthan

Mayank Sharma Vs State of Rajsthan and Ors.

Shailendra Sharma S/O Shri Shriniwas Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Master Govind Son of Shri Raghunandan Vs State of Rajasthan