High Court disposed of a criminal miscellaneous petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. directing police to ensure security against private respondents opposing the marriage. The Court clarified this order is not proof of age and independent of other proceedings.
Direction to SHO, Sevda, District Barmer to ensure vigilance and prevent harm to petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 257/2019
Smt. Pramila & Anr.
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan & Ors.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saransh VIJ For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.S. Rajpurohit, Public Prosecutor
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
17/01/2019
[CRLMP-257/2019]
(2 of 2)
opposed to the marriage.
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI)J.
Sanjay
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a direction for security and protection should be issued on the ground of grave threat to life and liberty following solemnization of marriage.
Whether the matrimonial order serves as proof of age.
Whether observations in this order affect subsequent criminal or civil proceedings against petitioners.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Pramila & Anr.
State of Rajasthan & Ors.
Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
