Dismissed

Anju Jangid D/O Shri Mangi Lal Jangid, W/O Shri Sita Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Apr 2019CRLMP/2442/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail petition sought protection for a newly married couple apprehending danger from those opposing their marriage. The Court directed the SHO to ensure their safety, clarifying that this order did not determine the marriage's age or validity.

What did the court decide?

Direct the Station House Officer to ensure no harm is caused to the petitioners' life and liberty by those opposing the marriage.

Anju Jangid D/O Shri Mangi Lal… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2442/2019

¶3

Anju Jangid D/o Shri Mangi Lal Jangid, W/o Shri Sita Ram, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Village Dhola Dheerawas, Tehsil Kotputli, District Jaipur, Raj.

¶4

Sita Ram Jangid S/o Shri Kailash Jangid, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Bhainslana Tehsil Kotputli, District Jaipur, Raj.

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp.

¶8

Mangi Lal Jangid S/o Shri Mahadev Prasad Jangid, R/o Village Dhola Dheerawas, Tehsil Kotputli, District Jaipur.

¶9

Director General Of Police, Police Headquarters, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶10

Superintendent Of Police, Jaipur Rural, District Jaipur, Raj. 5. Station House Officer, Police Station Kotputli, District Jaipur, Raj.

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.S. Chaudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arvind Chawla, PP

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH GUPTA

¶14

Judgment / Order

¶15

12/04/2019

¶16

The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioners whereby it is prayed that necessary direction be issued to the respondents No.3 to 5 to protect the petitioners as they apprehend danger to their life and liberty at the hands of those who are against the marriage.

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMP-2442/2019]

¶19

The newly married couple is present in person. They have been identified by their counsel Mr. M.S. Chaudhary, Advocate.

¶20

It is stated by Smt. Anju Jangid, petitioner No.1, who is present in person, that she is twenty years old. It is also submitted by her that she had performed marriage with petitioner No.2 Sita Ram Jangid according to her own free-will and accord and is living happily with him as a wife.

¶21

Having regard to the submission made by the learned counsel for the parties and going through the contents of the present petition, this Court is of the view that nobody can be permitted to take law in his own hands merely because marriage is not acceptable.

¶22

In the result, the present petition stands disposed of, by issuing direction to the concerned Station House Officer to ensure necessary observance that no harm is caused to the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of those, who are opposed to the marriage.

¶23

It is made clear that this order has been passed without determining the age and validity of the marriage of petitioners on the ground that those, who are opposed to the marriage, cannot cause harm to anybody.

¶24

(PRAKASH GUPTA),J

¶25

Mohit Rohila /121

Anju Jangid D/O Shri Mangi Lal Jangid, W/O Shri Sita Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anju Jangid D/O Shri Mangi Lal Jangid, W/O Shri Sita Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Dhuwariya S/O Mahendra Kumar Dhuwariya Vs State of Rajasthan

Rakesh Tiwari Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Satya Dev and Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan through P P

Smt Pooja Saini and Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Manisha Kumari D/O Shri Ratiram B/C Meghwal (Sc) Vs State of Rajasthan

Pawan Kumar Meena S/O Shri Ramphool Meena B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan