The Rajasthan High Court allowed a criminal miscellaneous petition invoking inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to discharge the petitioner of offences under Sections 467, 468, and 471 IPC, relying on a Supreme Court decision regarding compoundable offences and an amicable settlement.
Petitioner discharged of offences under Sections 467, 468, and 471 IPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2397/2019
Deva Ram S/o Kewal Ram, Aged About 39 Years, By Caste Patel, R/o Village - Narnadi, Tehsil And District Jodhpur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. N.K. Dadich & Dr. Jaya Dadich For Respondent : Mr. Gaurav Singh, PP Mr. C.S. Mandora
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
05/07/2019
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-2397/2019]
the extent of the offence under Sections 420 & 406 IPC and has
discharged the petitioner of the offence under Sections 420 & 406 IPC. However, the learned court below has declined to verify the compromise as regards the offence under Sections 467, 468 and 471 IPC on the ground that the said offence is non-compoundable.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
160-SanjayS/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be discharged of offences under Sections 467, 468, and 471 IPC in view of a compromise between the parties.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of M.P. V/s Laxmi Narayan & Ors.Relied on¶5
State of M.P. V/s Laxmi Narayan & Ors. [AIR 2019 SC 1296] · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Deva Ram
State Of Rajasthan
Seema Rani Mathur
Sharda Devi
Vinit Kumar Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
