This court dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking fair investigation, holding that grievances regarding police investigation prioritize of remedy before the Magistrate per the Supreme Court in Sakiri Vasu.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1468/2019
Pawan S/o Sh. Munna Singh B/c Rajput, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Raiwarpura, Thana Bayana, District Bharatpur, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, through PP
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Goyal. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar, PP.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Order
29/07/2019
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-1468/2019]
grievance that investigation has not been done properly by the Police. For this grievance, the remedy lies before the Magistrate concerned.
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
CHANDAN /15
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can exercise its power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct fair investigation when the prerogative remedy before the Magistrate remains available.
Whether the High Court should intervene in investigation discrepancies when the Prosecution reported offenders are not traceable.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pawan S/o Sh. Munna Singh B/c Rajput
State Of Rajasthan, through PP
Pankaj Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
