The High Court directed that the warrant of arrest against the petitioner be kept in abeyance for three weeks to allow surrender and bail application before the trial court, relying on Supreme Court precedent.
Warrant of arrest kept in abeyance for three weeks to enable petitioner to surrender and apply for bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 121/2019
Laxmi Lal Salvi S/o Sh. Roopa Ram Ji, Aged About 45 Years, B/c Salvi , 5/31, Housing Board Colony, Goverdhan Vilas Udaipur , Distt. Udaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sk Maru For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
09/01/2019
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-121/2019]
perusing the record of the case alongwith the precedent law cited at the Bar, the present petition is disposed of with the direction that the warrant of arrest issued against the petitioner vide order dated 24.5.2018 shall be kept in abeyance for a period of three weeks to enable the petitioner to surrender before the trial court and apply for bail.
(PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J
117-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the warrant of arrest issued against the petitioner should be converted into a bailable warrant to enable surrender.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Inder Mohan Goswami & Another Vs. State of Uttaranchal & OthersReferred¶14
AIR 2008 SC, 251 · Who else cites this
Laxmi Lal Salvi
State Of Rajasthan
Centurian Bank Of Punjab Ltd.
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
