Vishna Ram v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. but declined to press the application. The High Court dismissed the application as not pressed.
What did the court decide?
Bail application dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 9119/2019
Vishna Ram S/o Choutha Ram, Aged About 27 Years, B/c Bishnoi, R/o Village Ramdawas, P.s. Pipar City, Dist. Jodhpur. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Jodhpur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kailash Khilery For Respondent(s) : Mr. A. R. Choudhary, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
05/09/2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the 2nd bail application at this stage.
Accordingly, the 2nd bail application preferred by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as not pressed, at this stage.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to entertain the bail application which the petitioner chose not to press.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vishna Ram
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
Coram
Vinit Kumar Mathur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/9119/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court