Allowed

Mohan Ram @ Munna Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC21 May 2019CRLMB/776/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice Vinit Kumar Mathur granted bail to the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. after observing that the injured victim was discharged and recorded a statement. The bail was conditioned upon a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

What did the court decide?

Bail claimed by the petitioner is allowed on personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/each to the satisfaction of the trial court.

Mohan Ram @ Munna Ram Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 3^rd Bail Application No. 776/2019

¶3

Mohan Ram @ Munna Ram S/o Sh. Bhanwara Ram, Aged About 35 Years, B/c Beldar, R/o Utambar, P.S. Balesar, Distt. Jodhpur. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jodhpur )

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan

		----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. Navneet Singh Birkh
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, PP Mr. S.S. Rathore, for the complainant

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR

¶9

Order

¶10

21/05/2019

¶11

The present 3^rd bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody in connection with FIR No.64/2018, Police Station Balesar, District Jodhpur for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326/34 & 307/34 of the IPC.

¶12

The Second bail application of the petitioner was dismissed on 28.09.2018 by this Court.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant. Perused the material available on record.

¶14

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that after dismissal of the second bail application of the petitioner, the injured eyewitness appeared before the trial Court and his statement has

¶15

(2 of 2) [CRLMTB-776/2019]

¶16

been recorded. The petitioner is behind the bars for last more than 01 year. The conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore, it is prayed that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

¶17

Learned Public Prosecutor & learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. However, fairly concede that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital and his statement has been recorded before the learned trial Court.

¶18

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶19

Accordingly, the 3^rd bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Mohan Ram @ Munna Ram S/o Sh. Bhanwara Ram, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.64/2018, Police Station Balesar, District Jodhpur provided he furnishes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶20

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶21

20-SunilS/-

Mohan Ram @ Munna Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohan Ram @ Munna Ram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashish Agarwal Vs State of Rajasthan

Ashish Agarwal Vs State of Rajasthan

Ashish Agarwal Vs State of Rajasthan

Raj Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Raj Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Devendra Pal Singh Grover Vs State of Rajasthan