Allowed

Mahaveer Sharma S/O Shri Baluram Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC4 Jul 2019CRLMB/7640/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed an anticipatory bail application filed by Mahaveer Sharma in connection with offences under various sections of the IPC. The court considered the petitioner's claims of false implication and co-accused release without expressing an opinion on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed; directed to furnish personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

Mahaveer Sharma S/O Shri Baluram Sharma Vs State of… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7640/2019

¶3

Mahaveer Sharma S/o Shri Baluram Sharma, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Shiv Bazar, Meel Chowk, Bijaynagar, Distt. Ajmer Raj.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Basant Singh Chhaba For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Mahla, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH

¶10

Order

¶11

04/07/2019

¶12

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.01/2009 registered at Police Station Bijaynagar, District Ajmer for the offences under Sections 384, 306, 511, 379, 506, 323, 120-B of I.P.C.

¶13

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an advocate by profession and he has been falsely implicated in this matter due to previous enmity. Counsel further submits that the co-accused-Inderraj @ Tinnu has already been released on bail by this Court vide order dated 10.04.2019 passed in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.4588/2019.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶15

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CRLMB-7640/2019]

¶18

case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶19

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Bijaynagar, District Ajmer in F.I.R. No.01/2009 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner- Mahaveer Sharma S/o Shri Baluram Sharma, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶20

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶21

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶22

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶23

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

¶24

JYOTI /21

Mahaveer Sharma S/O Shri Baluram Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahaveer Sharma S/O Shri Baluram Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramkishore S/O Shri Bhagwan Sahai B/C Brahmin Vs State of Rajasthan

Indra Kumar @ Indrajeet S/O Shri Panchu Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramprasad@Ramu S/O Shri Bhagwan Sahai Meena B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Manish Saini S/O Puran Mali (Saini) Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Chaju Singh S/O Shri Bal Singh B/C Rajpoot Vs State of Rajasthan

Santosh Kumar S/O Shri Devi Sahai @ Deburam B/C Bairwa Vs State of Rajasthan