Dismissed

Babu Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC12 Jun 2019CRLMB/4750/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court rejected the petitioners' application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. due to the nature and gravity of the charges. However, the Court directed that if the petitioners surrender to the trial court by a specific date, their regular bail application shall be considered on the same day and they shall not be arrested in the interim.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail rejected; directed to surrender for immediate consideration of regular bail.

Babu Lal Vs State of Rajasthan — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4750/2019

¶3

Babu Lal S/o Shankar Keer, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Keerkhera , P.s. Bhinder , Distt. Udaipur (Raj.) (At Present Lodged At Central Jail , Udaipur)

¶4

Udai Lal S/o Babu Lal Keer, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Keerkhera , P.s. Bhinder , Distt. Udaipur (Raj.) (At Present Lodged At Central Jail , Udaipur)

¶5

----Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Ravindra Kumar Charan For Respondent(s) : Mr.Sharwan Bishnoi, P.P., assisted by Mr.Ravindra Khichi

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY CHATURVEDI (VACATION JUDGE)

¶11

Order

¶12

12/06/2019

¶13

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with F.I.R. No.12/2019, Police Station Bhinder, District Udaipur.

¶14

Heard. Perused the material available on record.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶16

Having regard to the nature of accusation, the gravity of the offence, material in record in support thereof and taking into consideration the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am not inclined to extend the benefit under Section 438 Cr.P.C. to

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMB-4750/2019]

¶19

the petitioners. Accordingly, the application preferred by the petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C. is hereby rejected.

¶20

However, it is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are ready to surrender before the concerned Court, which may consider his bail application on the same day.

¶21

Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the present case, in the interest of justice, it is directed that if the petitioners (1). Babu Lal S/o Shankar Keer and (2). Udai Lal S/o Babu Lal Keer surrender before the trial Court on or before 19.06.2019 and file a bail application, the concerned trial Court shall consider their bail application preferably on the same day in accordance with law. However, the petitioners shall not be arrested till then.

¶22

(ABHAY CHATURVEDI (VACATION JUDGE))

¶23

54-Kshama Dixit/-

Babu Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Babu Lal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagdish @ Pintu Vs State of Rajasthan

Babu Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Chhoga Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Shivnath Sarkar Vs State

Harpal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Budhram Vs State of Rajasthan