Allowed

Raju Sharma S/O Shri Om Prakash B/C Brahmin v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Jul 2019CRLMB/4369/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH allowed anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in an FIR involving cheating, forgery, and criminal conspiracy, directing release on personal bond with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail allowed; release on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each, subject to conditions of interrogation, non-interference, and not leaving India without permissi

Raju Sharma S/O Shri Om Prakash B/C Brahmin Vs State… — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4369/2019

¶3

Raju Sharma S/o Shri Om Prakash B/c Brahmin, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Village Diggi, Distt. Tonk Raj.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Mahla, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH

¶10

Order

¶11

03/07/2019

¶12

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.234/2018 registered at Police Station Diggi, District Tonk for the offences under Sections 143, 420, 467, 468, 406, 500 & 120B of IPC.

¶13

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this matter. Counsel further submits that in compliance of the order passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶15

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application.

¶16

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMB-4369/2019]

¶19

S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Diggi, District Tonk in F.I.R. No.234/2018 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner – Raju Sharma S/o Shri Om Prakash , he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:-

¶20

(i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶21

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and

¶22

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶23

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

¶24

Upendra/20

Raju Sharma S/O Shri Om Prakash B/C Brahmin v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raju Sharma S/O Shri Om Prakash B/C Brahmin v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rameshwar S/O Sh. Vijendra B/C Jat Vs State of Rajasthan

Farukh Mahbub Shekh @ Takla S/O Mohmmad Shekh @ Mahbub Shekh B/C Musalman Vs State of Rajasthan

Rishikesh S/O Shri Laduram B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramkishore S/O Shri Bhagwan Sahai B/C Brahmin Vs State of Rajasthan

Indra Kumar @ Indrajeet S/O Shri Panchu Lal Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramprasad@Ramu S/O Shri Bhagwan Sahai Meena B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan