The High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the petitioner's second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. as it was not pressed. However, at the counsel's request, the trial court was directed to expedite the trial.
Trial court directed to expedite the trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 376/2019
Narsingaram S/o Shri Fusaram @ Pusaram Ji, Aged About 23 Years, B/c Jat, R/o Aaula Nada, Janiyo Ki Dhani, Sindhipura, Karnu, Police Thana Pachudi, Dist. Nagaur. (Presently Lodged In Dist. Jail, Bhilwara)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M. L. Vishnoi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Order
23/05/2019
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner does not want to press this 2nd bail application.
Accordingly, the 2nd bail application preferred by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as not pressed.
However, on the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial.
(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR),J
24-SunilS/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the second bail application should be considered when it was not pressed by the petitioner.
Whether the trial court should be directed to expedite the trial despite the dismissal of the bail application.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Narsingaram S/o Shri Fusaram @ Pusaram Ji
State Of Rajasthan
Vinit Kumar Mathur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
