Allowed

Mohammed Irfan v. State

Rajasthan HC11 Jan 2019CRLMB/356/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan admitted this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. regarding offences under IPC. The petitioner represented the accused students who were allegedly involved in abduction and violation of modesty. The court granted bail without expressing opinion on merits, directing execution of a personal bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail upon executing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Mohammed Irfan Vs State — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 356/2019

¶3

Mohammed Irfan S/o Mubarik Khan Pathan, Aged About 22 Years, Luhariya Ps Mandal, Dist Bhilwara.

¶4

Samir S/o Munne Khan Pathan, Aged About 21 Years, Luhariya Ps Mandal, Dist Bhilwara (Dist Jail Bhilwara).

----Petitioners

Versus

State, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr.	R.S. Chundawat
For Respondent(s)	: Mr.	Pankaj Avasthi, P.P.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

¶11

Judgment / Order

¶12

11/01/2019

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

¶14

The petitioners have been arrested in FIR No.213/2018 of Police Station Sadar, Bhilwara for the offences punishable under Sections 366, 343, 384, 354, 392/34 of IPC. They have preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioners and the complainant are co-students and known to each other from last two years. It is also submitted that allegations of abduction and outrage modesty against the petitioners are false.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶17

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-356/2019]

¶18

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶19

Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners Mohammed Irfan S/o Mubarik Khan and Samir S/o Munne Khan shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.213/2018 of Police Station Sadar, Bhilwara provided each of them executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶20

(VIJAY BISHNOI),J

¶21

75-Taruna/-

Mohammed Irfan v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammed Irfan v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nitesh Vs State

Ruparam Vs State of Rajasthan

Naresh Vs State of Rajasthan

Ashok Kumar Vs State

Jogiraj Vs State of Rajasthan

Surendra Singh Vs State