Allowed

Gaurav Jadaun S/O Shri Satyendra Pal Singh B/C Rajpoot v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajasthan HC9 Aug 2019CRLMB/1573/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application allowed. The High Court held that since the court found the complainant and his family are mentally satisfied there is no chance for further violence and the application is part of the cause of action, bail was granted. The applicants will file a signed undertaking.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted by allowing the application. The applicants are directed to file a signed undertaking.

Gaurav Jadaun S/O Shri Satyendra Pal Singh B/C Rajpoot Vs… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1573 / 2019

¶3

jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqj

¶4

%% vkns'k %%

¶5

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1573/2019

¶6

Gaurav Jadaun S/o Shri Satyendra Pal Singh B/c Rajpoot, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 1/234, Vaishnu Colony, Keshav Nagar, Police Station Qawarsi, Aligarh (Uttar Pradesh)

¶7

----Accused-Petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

%% mifLFkr %% ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh

¶12

izkFkhZ ds vf/koDrk Jh egs'k xqIrkA yksd vfHk;kstd Jh jes'k pkS/kjhA ifjoknh ds vf/koDrk Jh lh-lh- jruwA

¶13

vkns'k fnukd 09-08-2019a

¶14

U;k;ky; }kjk %

¶15

izkFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr vfxze tekur dk ykHk nsus ds fy;s ;g izkFkZuk i= is'k fd;k x;k gSA

¶16

cgl lquh xbZA ;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ dk rdZ jgk fd nksuksa i{kksa ds e/; ek= oSokfgd fookn gS rFkk izkFkhZ ,oa ifjokfn;k ds chp e/;LFkrk dk;Zokgh Hkh gqbZ gS] ysfdu nqHkkZX;o'k vlQy jgh gSA mudk dFku jgk fd ekjihV ds ckcr dksbZ pksV

¶17

¶18

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1573 / 2019

¶19

izfrosnu izi= i=koyh ij ugha gS ,oa ngst ds lkeku ds ckcr tks vkjksi yxk;k x;k gS] og lk{; dk fo"k; gSA vr% vfxze tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA

¶20

;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd o ;ksX; vf/koDrk ifjoknh us vfxze tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;kA

¶21

leLr rdksZa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA dsl Mk;jh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA izdj.k esa miyC/k rF;kRed fLFkfr] izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ,oa vkjksiksa ds [k.Mu ds dze es a izLrqr rdksZa ,oa ekeys ds xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] izkFkhZ dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶22

ifj.kker% izkFkhZ xkSjo tknkSu dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g vfxze tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS rFkk vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh@Fkkukf/kdkjh] iqfyl Fkkuk] efgyk Fkkuk] nf{k.k t;iqj dks funsZ'k fn;s tkrs gSa fd og muds ;gkWa iathc) izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k &170@2018 esa izkFkhZ dks fxjQ~rkj fd;s tkus dh lwjr esa ;fn izkFkhZ muds larks"kizn ipkl gtkj :i;s dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= ,oa iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s jkf'k dh nks tekursa izLrqr dj rLnhd djok ns rks mls fuEu 'krkZas ds v/khu tekur ij vktkn dj fn;k tk, %

¶23

1- fd izkFkhZ iqfyl vf/kdkjh }kjk iwNs tkusokys ifjiz'uksa dk mRrj nsus ds fy;s tSls vkSj tc visf{kr gks] miyC/k gksxkA

¶24

2- fd izkFkhZ bl ekeys ds rF;ksa ls voxr fdlh O;fDr dks U;k;ky; ;k fdlh iqfyl vf/kdkjh ds le{k ,sls rF;ksa dks izdV u djus ds fy;s eukus ds okLrs izR;{k% vFkok ijks{k :i ls mls dksbZ mRizsj.kk] /kedh ;k opu ugha nsxkA

¶25

3- fd izkFkhZ fcuk U;k;ky; dh iwoZ vuqefr ds Hkkjr ugha NksM+sxkA

¶26

¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr

¶27

Fkkokuh@&

Gaurav Jadaun S/O Shri Satyendra Pal Singh B/C Rajpoot v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gaurav Jadaun S/O Shri Satyendra Pal Singh B/C Rajpoot v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Case details

Similar cases

Nishant Ali S/O Shri Shoaib Ali B/C Musalman Vs State of Rajasthan

Matukdhari S/O Guleshwar Vs Narcotic Control Bureau

Nihal Devi W/O Ram Kishore B/C Ahir Vs State of Rajasthan

Subhash S/O Hari Singh B/C Nayak Vs State of Rajasthan

Rahul Meghwal S/O Rakesh Vs State of Rajasthan

Shishram S/O Sh. Sirdar B/C Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan