Allowed

Gokali W/O Bheru B/C Dhakad v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC11 Dec 2019CRLMB/15385/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with an FIR registered against her. The court imposed standard conditions including availability for interrogation, refrainment from tampering with witnesses, and not leaving India without permission.

What did the court decide?

Grant of anticipatory bail conditioned on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties in Rs. 25,000/- each and compliance with standard bail conditions.

Gokali W/O Bheru B/C Dhakad Vs State of Rajasthan — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15385/2019

¶3

Gokali W/o Bheru, B/c Dhakad, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Gopalpura P.s. Devli Dist. Tonk Raj.

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Ola, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR

¶10

Order

¶11

11/12/2019

¶12

This bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No. 339/2019 registered at P.S. Devli, District Tonk for the offences mentioned therein against the applicant, whereupon the investigation was commenced. Apprehending her arrest, the petitioner moved the bail application before the court below, which was dismissed. Hence, this bail application has been filed.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material made available on record.

¶14

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is a lady and cross cases have also been registered between both the parties. There is no specific opinion of the doctor with regard to the injury sustained by injured which is dangerous to life.

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-15385/2019]

¶17

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has

¶18

opposed the bail application.

¶19

Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by

¶20

the learned counsel for applicant, note of the allegations levelled against the applicant as also looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant.

¶21

Therefore, this bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Gokali w/o Bheru in the aforesaid FIR, she shall be released on bail by the concerned SHO/Investigating Officer, provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the SHO/IO of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:

¶22

i) That the petitioner shall make herself available for interrogation before the police officer, as and when required;

¶23

ii) That the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case, so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer;

¶24

iii) That the petitioner/s shall not leave India without prior permission of the court;

¶25

iv) That the petitioner/s shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which she is accused or suspected.

¶26

(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR),J

¶27

ashu /17

Gokali W/O Bheru B/C Dhakad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gokali W/O Bheru B/C Dhakad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajveer S/O Shri Guljhari Lal B/C Jat Vs State of Rajasthan

Rai Singh S/O Amar Singh B/C Tanwar Vs State of Rajasthan

Sherkhan S/O Aameen B/C Musalman Vs State of Rajasthan

Mubarik S/O Shahbuden Khan B/C Musalman Vs State of Rajasthan

Jaipal Singh Urf J.P. S/O Shree Dhan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Dashrath Singh S/O Shri Mangi Singh B/C Rajput Vs State of Rajasthan