In a batch hearing of multiple bail applications, the court fixed the applications for hearing before lunch on the same day the petitioners were required to submit their statements to ensure timely consideration by the full bench if a vacancy arose.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqj
%% vkns'k %%
1.S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12227/2019
Sandeep Sharma S/o Shri Radheshyam Sharma B/c Brahmin, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 39 A Krishan Nagar Kartarpura Jaipur Metropolitan Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
AND
2. S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13230/2019
Shubham Verma S/o Late Shri Miland Verma, R/o K-7A, Krishna Nagar Kartarpura Jaipur Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
%% mifLFkr %%
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh
izkFkhZx.k ds vf/koDrk Jh eqds'k esgjk rFkk Jh ckcwyky cSjok yksd vfHk;kstd Jh iadt vxzoky
2
vkns'k fnukd 15-10-2019a
U;k;ky; }kjk %
izkFkhZx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 438 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds rgr iqfyl Fkkuk] egs'k uxj] t;iqj esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k &449@2018 esa vfxze tekur dk ykHk nsus ds fy;s mijksDr nksuksa iFkd&iFkd izkFkZuk i= is'k fd;s x;s gSA pwafd nksuksa izkFkhZx.k }kjk ,d gh ekeys esa mDr izkFkZuk i= is'k fd, x;s gSa] vr% budk fuLrkj.k fuEukuqlkj ,d lkFk fd;k tk jgk gSA
;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k us izdV fd;k fd os bl vfxze tekur vkosnu ij cy ugha (Not Press) nsrs gSa] ysfdu mudk fuosnu jgk fd izkFkhZx.k l{ke v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa leiZ.k dj nsaxs] vr% l{ke v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dks mlh fnu izkFkhZx.k ds }kjk izLrqr tekur vkosnu dk fuLrkj.k djus ckcr funsZ'k fn;k tk,A
;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us fu;ekuqlkj vkns'k ikfjr djus dk fuosnu fd;kA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k ds nksuksa vfxze tekur vkosnu cy ugha fn;s tkus ds vk/kkj ij [kkfjt fd, tkrs gSaA
;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZx.k ds fuosnu ,oa ekeys ds rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, funsZ'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZx.k ;fn e/;kg~u iwoZ (before lunch) l{ke v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds le{k leiZ.k djrs gS vkSj izkFkhZx.k }kjk leiZ.k djus
3
ds i'pkr l{ke v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa fu;fer tekur vkosnu is'k fd;k tkrk gS rks l{ke v/khuLFk U;k;ky; iqfyl fjek.M dh vko';drk u gks vFkok fjek.M vof/k lekIr gks pqdh gks] ml fLFkfr esa fof/k vuqlkj xq.kkoxq.k ij] bl vkns'k ls izHkkfor gq, fcuk] tgkWa rd lEHko gks lds] mlh fnu dsl Mk;jh ryc dj tekur vkosnu dk fuLrkj.k djus dk iz;kl djsA
¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr
ts ,l iaokj@7&8
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the bail applications be dismissed for non-submission of arresting officer's statement.
Whether the proceedings be quashed to ensure consideration of bail applications before the Supreme Court on the same day.
Sandeep Sharma
Shubham Verma
State Of Rajasthan
Dr. S.M. Elahi
Shri Rajesh Jain
Shri Vineet Bhargava
Shri Sanjay Arora
Shri Ravi Shankar Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
