Anil Kumar v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. dismissed because it was not pressed by the petitioner. No substantive ruling on merits.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11489/2019
Anil Kumar S/o Sh. Rameshwarlal, Aged About 22 Years, B/c Jat, R/o Ward No. 6, Dholipal, Police Station Hanumangarh Sadar, Tehsil And District Hanumangarh. (Presently Lodged At District Jail, Hanumangarh)
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.D. Goswami For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Solanki, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Order
20/09/2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the bail application. Accordingly, the bail application preferred by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anil Kumar
- respondent
State
Coram
VIJAY BISHNOI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/11489/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court