Allowed

Asha W/O Ramesh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC28 Aug 2019CRLMB/10868/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge of Rajasthan High Court allowed bail application filed by five female accused confined in Sub Jail Bandikui. Petitioners held for offences under Sections 380 and 382 IPC. Court directed release on bail with personal bond and two sureties subject to appearance before trial court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail with Rs. 1,00,000/- personal bond and two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.

Asha W/O Ramesh Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10868/2019

¶3

Asha W/o Ramesh, B/c Mogiya Bagariya R/o Kalyanpura Ps Simliya Dist. Kota (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bandikui)

¶4

Kanti W/o Moharpal, B/c Mogiya Bagariya R/o Bamuliya Kala Ps Anta Dist. Baran (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bandikui)

¶5

Hemlata W/o Dheeraj, B/c Mogiya Bagariya R/o Dugrajya Ps Bigod Dist. Kota (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bandikui)

¶6

Karina D/o Moharpal, B/c Mogiya Bagariya R/o Bamuliya Kala Ps Anta Dist. Baran (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bandikui)

¶7

Banti W/o Dhanraj, B/c Mogiya Bagariya R/o Kalyanpura Ps Simliya Dist. Kota (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bandikui)

¶8

----Petitioners

¶9

Versus

¶10

State Of Rajasthan, through PP

¶11

----Respondent

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Umashanker Pandey. For State : Mr. F.R. Meena, PP.

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

¶14

Order

¶15

28/08/2019

¶16

Petitioners have filed this bail application under Section

¶17

439 of Cr.P.C.

¶18

F.I.R. No.361/2019 was registered at Police Station Bandikui,

¶19

District Dausa for offence under Sections 380 & 382 of I.P.C.

¶20

(2 of 2)

¶21

[CRLMB-10868/2019]

¶22

It is contended by counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are females. They are in custody for last more than one month. Recovery has been effected.

¶23

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶24

I have considered the contentions.

¶25

Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the petitioner, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.

¶26

This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused petitioners shall be released on bail provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/(Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶27

A copy of this order be sent to concerned S.H.O. for recording this condition in the Village Crime Record Book so that in the event of petitoner's repeating offence, S.H.O. can move the Court for cancellation of bail.

¶28

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

¶29

CHANDAN /71

Asha W/O Ramesh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Asha W/O Ramesh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Heeralal S/O Bhooraram B/C Jat Vs State of Rajasthan

Ramkumar Sinsinwar Son of Late Shri Bhanwar Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt Vitthal Devi and Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Premprakash Meena S/O Late Shri Dungarsi Das Meena B/C Meena Vs State of Rajasthan

Bijendra Son of Shri Chhote, by Caste Prajapati, Vs State of Rajasthan

Pramod Kumar Gupta S/O Shrikrishan Gupta B/C Gupta (Mathur Vaishya) Vs State of Rajasthan