Allowed

Pratik Singh v. State

Rajasthan HC6 Sept 2019CRLMB/10839/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur, hearing a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., granted bail to two accused persons charged with offences under various provisions of the IPC, including cheating and forgery, directing them to execute a bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners were released on bail; directed to execute a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

Pratik Singh Vs State — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2019)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

¶2

JODHPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10839/2019

¶4

Pratik Singh S/o Subhash Singh, Aged About 21 Years, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Gigdiya, Chidawa District Jhunjhunun.

¶5

Amit Kumar S/o Umrao Singh, Aged About 23 Years, By Caste Jat, Resident Of Balot Pacheri Kallan, Tehsil And District Jhunjhunun. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail Jodhpur).

¶6

----Petitioners Versus

¶7

State, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dhanraj Vaishnav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Laxman Solanki, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

¶11

Judgment / Order

¶12

06/09/2019

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

¶14

The petitioners have been arrested in FIR No.179/2019 of Police Station Banar District Jodhpur for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 419, 467, 468, 471, 120-B IPC. They have preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that after rejection of the first bail application of the petitioners, chargesheet has been filed.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CRLMB-10839/2019]

¶19

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶20

Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners Pratik Singh S/o Subhash Singh and Amit Kumar S/o Umrao Singh shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.179/2019 of Police Station Banar District Jodhpur provided each of them executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶21

(VIJAY BISHNOI),J

¶22

SURABHII/101-

Pratik Singh v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pratik Singh v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shahzad Khan @ Dhoni Vs State of Rajasthan

Karma Ram Vs State

Bhanwar @ Ramesh @ Amiya Vs State

Sita Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt Sangeeta Vs State

Govind Ram Vs State of Rajasthan