The petitioner filing a bail application under Section 438 CrPC for anticipatory relief in an FIR involving Sections 341, 323, 325, 326, and 34 IPC was denied relief by the court due to the serious nature of the allegations.
The petition seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1035/2019
Aalamdeen S/o Shri Kalu Khan B/c Mev, R/o Kamal Ka Bas, Kakrali, Police Station Sadar, District Alwar Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner : Mr. Mahendra Verma on behalf of
Mr. Azad Ahmed
For Respondent : Mr. N.S. Dhakad, P.P.
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Judgment
29/01/2019
Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R. No. 247/2017 registered at Police Station Sadar, District Alwar for offence under Sections 341, 323, 325, 326, 34 Indian Penal Code, 1860.
Heard.
As per the prosecution story, petitioner and his co-accused had inflicted injuries to the victim. Petitioner is specifically named in the FIR.
Keeping in view the seriousness of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, no ground for grant of anticipatory bail to him is made out.
Dismissed.
(SABINA)J.
Mohita/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to a petitioner specifically named in FIR for offences under Sections 341, 323, 325, 326, and 34 IPC.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Aalamdeen
State of Rajasthan
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
