A single judge ordered the dismissal of a criminal appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the SC/ST Act. The appeal, filed by Gautam Singh, was dismissed only because the appellant's counsel submitted that the appellant no longer wished to press the matter and had not argued on merits.
Criminal appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of SC/ST Act is dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 361/2019
Gautam Singh S/o Shiv Singh, Aged About 28 Years, B/c Ravana Rajput, Resident Of Nausar, Ps And Tehsil Baytu, District Barmer (Raj) (Lodged In District Jail Barmer)
----Appellant
Versus
State, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Dhirendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.R. Choudhary, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Order
09/08/2019
Learned counsel for the appellant, without arguing on merits, has submitted that he does not want to press this criminal appeal.
Accordingly, this criminal appeal preferred on behalf of the appellant under Section 14(A)(2) of SC/ST Act is dismissed as not pressed.
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
141-Babulal/-
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to determine the merits of the appeal when the appellant has ceased to press the matter.
Whether to allow the withdrawal of the criminal appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of SC/ST Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Gautam Singh
State
Vijay Bishnoi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
