Single page order wherein the perforate plea of the petitioner regarding termination of service on 03-04-2019 was not entertained or decided in the text provided; the order mentions reading of the impugned order dated 31-01-2019 but lacks the actual disposition in this snippet.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqj ,dyihB flfoy fofo/k izkFkZuk i= la[;k&88@2019 vUrxZr ,dyihB flfoy fofo/k vihy l[;ka &5664@2018
vkns'k fnukad%& 03-04-2019
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh izdk'k xqIrk
vf/koDrk okLrs izkFkhZ %& Jh vejukFk ikjhd
lquk x;k A
;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ@izR;FkhZ la[;k&2 Jh vejukFk ikjhd dk fuosnu gS fd fu.kZ;@vkns'k fnukad 31-01-2019 esa mudh mifLFkfr ntZ gksus ls jg xbZ gS] tcfd os ml fnu U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr Fks] vr% fu.kZ;@vkns'k fnukad 31-01-2019 esa izR;FkhZ la[;k&2 chek daiuh dh vksj ls mudh mifLFkfr ntZ dh tkdj fu.kZ; fnukad 31-01-2019 blh vuqlkj la'kksf/kr fd;k tkos A
izkFkZuk i= esa vafdr rF;k s a o dkj.kksa dks nf"Vxr j[krs gq, fu.kZ;@vkns'k fnukad 31-01-2019 ds i"B la[;k&1 esa For Respondent(s) ds vkxs Mr. Amarnath Pareek Hkh i<+k tkosA fu.kZ;@vkns'k fnukad 31-01-2019 dk i`"B la[;k&1 blh izdkj la'kksf/kr fd;k tkrk gS A
izkFkZuk i= blh vuqlkj Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS A
;g vkns'k] fu.kZ;@vkns'k fnukad 31-01-2019 dk Hkkx jgsxk A
¼U;k0 izdk'k xqIrk½
_f"kds'k lksuh@23
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Jh izdk'k xqIrk
Jh vejukFk ikjhd
Jh izdk'k xqIrk
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
