dependents, one third of the said income is liable to be deducted > towards personal expenses of the deceased. As the deceased was aged about 21 years at the time of accident, therefore, multiplier of 18 would be applied to work out the dependency of the claimants. In this way, the compensation comes to Rs.3,14,496/(2,1842/312~18). The claimants would be further entitled to receive Rs.70,000/towards conventional heads. Thus, the total amount of compensati'on receivablk t* . hy the claimants comes to '~A'ccordingly, this appeal is partly allowed. Impugned r, award dated 27.05.2004 is modified to the extent fhat the compensation amount rdc&~a,ble by the claimants is I: %. 4 j ; * $ ? ' , ,.$., .? ,I .t ..$ >$ a:% *I>** Rs.3,84,496/instead,':o~+s-,:1;7f0/-' ..?. - **.a* , , as awarded by the a ,,, t'= k Tribunal. Remaining term.$and5.cofiditions of the award shall be the ' t $, = ,&, -> i .j 1, same. The Insurance o.arishll a . . - .": dkp6sdit the enhanced amount * 5% along with the interest @'6% per an-num from the date of filing of 7 the claim petition till date of payment with the Tribunal within a ;t*i i. , ( ' s $. . :.+ " % period of two monthskrom tpday.' It'. is further ordered that the s. s -- 8 4' share of the enhance,d arndLnt of $he compensation shall be invested in fixed depo$i.t,ui,tb-,a nationalised bank initially for a A! . ,$ ji J! 3' ->s iq* 2 ., i( h period of 2 years and the interest accrued thereon shall be paid to
