Petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition alleging compliance with the impugned order. The Court allowed the withdrawal and discharged the rule.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn; rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 38312019
D.B. Civil Special Appeal (Writ) No.860/2017
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 190/2012
Road, 11 Meel,
Tehsil Sanganer,
Jaipur.
Appellant
'? Versus $,&@.-,
I. S :-ri Pradeep Kumar Mittal, Managing Director, Rajasthan
onstruction Corporation
er, Rajasthan State
n Corporation Ltd.
Shri Avinash ector, Rajasthan State
Road Developm ction Corporation Ltd.
For a Advocate on
endra Shah Advocate
For Respondent(s)
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA HON'BEE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Judqment - / Order
14/12/2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted he may be permitted to withdraw the petition as the order-in-question has been complied with.
Ordered accordingly.
Rule stands discharged.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Sanjay Kumawat-41
LAURENCE STORY
RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD
Sabina Shevtsov
Narendra Singh Dhaddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
