The petitioner was permitted to withdraw the writ petition to pursue other appropriate remedies of law. No substantive order was passed on the merits.
Permitted the withdrawal of the petition to enable the petitioner to avail other appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.291/2019
In
D.B. Civil Writ No.21770/2017
Aam Janta, Vyaso Ka Nohra, Tehsil Ramgarh Pachwara, District Dausa, Through Nathulal S/o Shri Mangilal B/c Mali, Aged 57, R/o Village Vyaso Ka Nohra, Tehsil Ramgarh Pachwara, District Dausa (Raj)
----Petitioner
Versus
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. P. S. Rajawat
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
16/12/2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition to enable the petitioner to avail other appropriate remedy as per law.
Ordered accordingly.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
(SABINA),J
Seema/71
Aam Janta, Vyaso Ka Nohra, Through Nathulal S/o Shri Mangilal B/c Mali
State Of Raj. Through District Collector, Dausa Rajasthan
SABINA
NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
