Honorble High Court of Rajasthan at Jaipur adjourned a writ petition listing a condition for deposit of process fee and taking out notice against an unserved respondent.
Counsel to deposit process fee and take notice for respondent No. 4; case to be listed after two weeks; otherwise dismiss.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writs No. 2482/2017
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dinesh Chand for respondent No.3
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Order
20/02/2019
None present for the petitioner.
Office report is reflects non-deposit of process fee along with notices for respondent number 3 and 4.
Counsel for the petitioner would deposit process fee and take out notice for service on unserved respondent number 4.
Steps be taken within two weeks; failing which, the writ application shall stand automatically dismissed without further reference to the Court.
Matter be listed after two weeks.
(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA),J
Seema/3
Hanuman S/o Late Shri Hariprasad Mahant
Silli @ Govind S/o Late Shri Hariprasad Mahant
Nemichand Garg
Dinesh Chand Garg
Prahlad S/o Late Shri Ramsahay
Param S/o Late Shri Hariprasad Mahant
Veerendr Singh Siradhana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
