The High Court of Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench (D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1045/2019, arising from Writ Petition No. 12976/2013) dismissed a contempt petition because the petitioner's counsel submitted that the respondent had complied with the impugned judgment and the petitioner did not press the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D. B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1045/2019
In
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12976/2013
D.P. Gupta S/o Sh. Ram Ji Lal Gupta, Aged About 56 Years, R/o 41, Surya Nagar, Taron Ki Koot, Tonk Road, Jaipur At Present Working As Chief Law Assistant, North Western Zone, North Western Railway, Head Quarter Officer Jagatpura, Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
Mr. Rajesh Tiwari, General Manager, North Western Zone, North Western Railway, Head Quarter Office, Jagatpura, Jaipur
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Agarwal.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
26/08/2019
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that compliance of the judgment, contempt of which has been alleged in the present contempt petition, has been made by the respondent. He therefore does not press present contempt petition.
Contempt petition is dismissed as not pressed.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
(MOHAMMAD RAFIQ),J
MANOJ NARWANI /4
D.P. Gupta
Rajesh Tiwari
Mohammad Rafiq
Narendra Singh Dhadha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
