The Single Judge Court dismissed the Writ Review petition against an earlier order that denied provident fund benefits, noting that it was impossible for funds to be received under both Contributory and General schemes simultaneously.
The review petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
D.B. Writ Review No. 64/2018
----Petitioners
Versus
----Respondents
For Respondent(s) : -----
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
10/09/2018
Civil Misc. Application No.350/2018 and Writ Review No.
64/2018 :-
(2 of 2)
[WRW-64/2018]
member of Contributory Provident Fund Scheme and also General Provident Fund Scheme.
343 days in seeking review.
(PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J (PRADEEP NANDRAJOG),CJ
Kshama Dixit/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether grounds exist to condone the delay of 343 days in seeking review.
State Of Rajasthan
Smt. Sukhi Kanwar
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
