In this writ restoration matter, the petitioner did not appear before the High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur. The Single Bench hereby dismissed the restoration application ex parte as no one represented the petitioner.
The restoration application is dismissed due to non-appearance of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Restoration No. 104 / 2018
Ram Vallabh Son of Shri Ram Lal, Aged About 87 Years, By Caste Brahmin, Resident of Jaitaran, Tehsil Jaitaran, District Pali.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
_____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) :None present
For Respondent(s) :
_____________________________________________________ HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
05/05/2018
No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner.
The restoration application is dismissed.
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI)J.
sudheer
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the restoration application filed by the petitioner should be allowed in the absence of appearance.
What is the court's decision regarding the restoration application when the petitioner is not present?
Ram Vallabh
Bharat Singh
Anjan Kanwar
Raju Singh
Samandar Singh
Prithvi Singh
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
