Petitioners withdrew applications seeking leave to withdraw. The court dismissed the applications as not pressed, noting that the underlying orders are appealable. The order contains no operative decision on the substantive land matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
Mahaveer And Ors.
----Petitioners
Versus
The State of Rajasthan And Ors.
----Respondents
Connected with
Mahaveer And Ors.
----Petitioners Versus
The State of Rajasthan And Ors.
----Respondents
Mahaveer & Ors.
----Petitioners Versus The State of Rajasthan And Ors. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manjeet Godara on behalf of Mr. Sunil Beniwal For Respondent(s) : ---
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
14/09/2018
(2 of 2)
[WMAP-247/2018]
applicants treating the applicants as encroachers are appealable orders and the applicants desire to file an appeal against the orders passed by the Naib Tehsildar/Tehsildar declaring them to be trespassers.
(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J (PRADEEP NANDRAJOG),CJ
Mohit Tak
Mahaveer And Ors.
The State of Rajasthan And Ors.
Pradeep Nandrajog
Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
