Two writ contempt petitions were filed. The High Court noted that the underlying orders dated 04.01.2018 had been complied with and disposed of the petitions as infructuous.
Contempt petitions disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN JODHPUR
D.B. Writ Contempt No. 870/2018
M.S. Panwar
----Petitioner
Versus
Sh. R. Subrahmanyam And Ors.
----Respondents
Connected With
D.B. Writ Contempt No. 1017/2018
S.P. Tak
----Petitioner Versus
Santosh Kumar Mall
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himanshu Shrimali. Mr. Hemant Shrimali. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Kataria.
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
08/10/2018
(Dr. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J (PRADEEP NANDRAJOG),CJ
Ashutosh
M.S. Panwar
Sh. R. Subrahmanyam and Ors.
S.P. Tak
Santosh Kumar Mall
Mr. Pradeep Nandrajog
Dr. Pushpendra Singh Bhati
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
