Petitioner withdrew the contempt petition after complying with a prior order. The High Court discharged notices and disposed of the petition for statistical purposes.
Notices of contempt discharged; contempt petition disposed of for statistical purposes.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Contempt No. 144/2018
Pawan Kumar S/o Shri Sohan Kumar, aged 31 years, R/o 144, Bijyawali Dhani, Ward No. 5, Shrimadhopur, District Sikar Raj..
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Awar Dan Ujjwal
JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA Judgment
09/10/2018
Mr. Awar Dan Ujjwal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner informs that the requisite compliance of the order dated 27.11.2017 has been made, for which he does not want to proceed with the contempt petition.
In view of the above statement, this Court is not inclined to proceed with the contempt petition.
Notices of contempt are hereby discharged.
The contempt petition stands disposed of for statistical purposes.
(DINESH MEHTA),J
Anurag/30
Pawan Kumar
The State Of Rajasthan
Naveen Mahajan
P.C. Kishan
Vishram Meena
DINESH MEHTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
