Nandkishore v. State of Rajasthan through Pp
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court of Rajasthan dismissed bail application for accused who remained absent during the bail hearing.
What did the court decide?
NULL
High Court of Rajasthan dismissed bail application for accused who remained absent during the bail hearing.
NULL
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-412/2018 Nandkishore Vs. State of Raj.
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky;] t;iqj ihB] t;iqjA
%% vkns'k %%
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-412/2018 IN S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 641/2018
Nandkishore S/o Amarlal B/c Kandara, R/o Behind Old Motor Garage, Jhalwar, District Jhalawar, At Present Patwari, Patwar Mandal Dungargaon, Tehsil Jhalrapatan, District Jhalawar, Raj. (Jail In Kota).
----Appellant/Accused
Versus
State Of Rajasthan Through Pp.
----Respondent
%% mifLFkr %%
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh egsUnz ekgs'ojh
vihykFkhZ ds vf/koDrk Jh pUnznhiflag tks/kkA yksd vfHk;kstd Jh jkejru xqtZjA
%% vkns'k %% 07-05-2018
U;k;ky; }kjk %&
izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ dh vksj ls /kkjk 389 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds varxZr izLrqr ltk LFkxu@tekur vkosnu ij nksuksa i{kksa dks lquk x;kA v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkyksP; fu.kZ;
2
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-412/2018 Nandkishore Vs. State of Raj.
,oa i=koyh ij miyC/k dkuwuh o rF;kRed fLFkfr ij fopkj fd;k x;kA
;ksX; vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ dk dFku jgk fd fopkj.k ds nkSjku izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ tekur ij vktkn jgk gSA vr% ltk LFkxu vkosnu dks Lohdkj fd;s tkus dh izkFkZuk dh xbZA
;ksX; yksd vfHk;kstd us ltk LFkxu vkosnu dk
fojks/k fd;kA
leLr rF;ksa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ dks Hkz"Vkpkj fuokj.k vf/kfu;e dh fofHkUu /kkjkvksa e sa nks"kh djkj nsrs gq, vf/kdre pkj o"kZ dh ltk ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gSA fopkj.k ds nkSjku izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ dk tekur ij vktkn gksuk crk;k x;k gSA vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa ,oa vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxus dh lEHkkouk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izkFkhZ&vihykFkhZ uanfd'kksj bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 07-06-2018 dks ,oa rRi'pkr tc Hkh mls vknsf'kr fd;k tkos] viuh mifLFkfr gsrq ipkl gtkj :i;s dk ca/ki= ,oa iPphl&iPphl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekursa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn izLrqr dj rLnhd djok ns rks mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk, ,oa fo}ku fof'k"V
3
S.B. Cri. Bail (SOS) Application-412/2018 Nandkishore Vs. State of Raj.
U;k;k/kh'k] ls'ku U;k;ky;] Hkz"Vkpkj fuokj.k vf/kfu;e] dksVk }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k &27@2007 esa ikfjr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; fnukafdr 27-03-2018 ds rgr fn;s x;s n.Mkns'k dk fdz;kUo;u bl vihy ds vfUre fu.kZ; rd LFkfxr j[kk tkrk gSA
¼egsUnz ekgs'ojh½ U;k;kf/kifr
Fkkokuh@& mijksDr fu.kZ;@vkns'k Hkkjr ljdkj dk jkti= la[;k&1] fnukad 02 tuojh] 1999 esa izdkf'kr x`g ea=ky;] jktHkk"kk foHkkx ds ladYi@uksfVfQds'ku ds rgr lacaf/kr Hkk"kk ¼fgUnh½ esa [kqys U;k;ky; eas fy[kk;k x;kA
Nandkishore S/o Amarlal
State of Rajasthan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court