Vimla Choudhary Vs State Education Dep Ors.

Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that since the matter relates to transfer, therefore, at this stage, the petitioner would be satisfied, if the respondents are directed to consider and decide her representation, which she is ready and willing to address, against a vacant post, that may be available.

¶15

In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioner to address a comprehensive representation detailing out her grievances within two weeks hereinafter.

¶16

In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid

¶17

(2 of 2) [CW-9730/2018]

¶18

period, the respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.

¶19

With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the

¶20

writ application stands disposed off.

¶21

(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.

¶22

SS/124

Vimla Choudhary v. State Education Dep Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vimla Choudhary v. State Education Dep Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashish Kumar Sharma and Ors. Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Jogender Singh Vs State Education Department Ors.

Kamlesh Kumar Jajariya Vs State Education Department Ors.

Dharmveer Singh Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Dipti Modi Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Yad Ram Khati Vs State of Raj and Ors.